Navigating the Ethical Maze of School Safety: A TV Case Study
Hi, my name is Olivia. I have been a Joffe Safety Consultant for the last two and a half years while finishing my doctorate in public health, which...
New York state's recent ban on realistic lockdown drills is a significant victory - a step toward much-needed reform in how we conduct safety drills. I sincerely hope this change marks the beginning of a larger effort to ensure that drills nationwide are both practice and trauma-informed. This topic is especially close to my heart, as someone who has spent the last four years earning a doctorate in school-based gun violence and the last two years as a Joffe Safety Consultant. Fifty-four years of documented school shootings teach us that we must embrace research, learn from real-life scenarios, and advocate keeping our students physically AND emotionally safe.
Lockdown drills are required in over forty states, yet there is considerable variation in their execution. You may have heard of Run Hide Fight, Avoid Deny Defend, A.L.I.C.E. training, or the Standard Response Protocols. All of these programs are mission-aligned in that they prepare staff and students for the worst-case scenario. However, besides having differing philosophies and implementation practices on how to keep students physically safe (both during actual scenarios and during practice), I’m increasingly concerned by the lack of alignment and focus on how to keep students psychologically safe as well.
In my role as a national school safety consultant, I’ve learned that drills with students do not need to be realistic to be effective. For example, in 1851, the NYT reported on a tragic incident where forty students died during a fire drill evacuation in Greenwich, even though no fire was present. This historical example highlights that our reaction to emergencies can have serious consequences, when when no real danger exists. Similarly, modern fire drills, which avoid adding realism such as simulated smoke, focus on practice without inducing fear. We don't simulate smoke in the air vents for fire drills; why terrify students with fake "intruders"? The focus of drills should be on muscle memory, not fear.
Studies have shown that using realism in lockdown drills can actually increase the perception that school is an unsafe place to be, undermining the goal of creating a safe learning environment. We have also seen the consequences of drills not being conducted properly and students being physically injured in the process, like a 2019 drill conducted at a middle school in New Richmond, Ohio, that resulted in two students needing medical attention because of confusion of policies.
So, how can we balance safety and emotional safety as a community? By returning to the root objective of a school emergency drill: to create muscle memory so that your body knows what to do when that initial moment of crisis sets in.
Steps for Safer, More Effective Drills
New York’s decision to ban realistic lockdown drills is a positive step- one that I applaud and hope other states follow. We will continue to work together to prepare students for emergencies without instilling fear and trauma.
Hi, my name is Olivia. I have been a Joffe Safety Consultant for the last two and a half years while finishing my doctorate in public health, which...
Why Participate in the Great ShakeOut? The Great ShakeOut is the world’s largest earthquake drill, and it’s designed to be more than a simple...
New York state's recent ban on realistic lockdown drills is a significant victory - a step toward much-needed reform in how we conduct safety drills....